In early
March 1783, the local economy was in decline and people were going
hungry. A poor harvest the year before plus the knock-on economic
effects of the American Revolutionary War had caused food to become
scarce and prices to rise sharply and a number of food riots broke
out in Newcastle and the Potteries as a result. The most serious of
these took place around the canal at Etruria and may well have been
started by some of Josiah Wedgwood's workers.
|
A view of Wedgwood's Etruria works from across the canal. From The Life of Josiah Wedgwood (1865) by Eliza Meteyard. |
There had
been some trouble in Newcastle for several days and the rioters there
seem to have joined or inspired the riot that broke out at Etruria on
Friday 7th March. The trouble started when a barge carrying much-needed
supplies of cheese and flour moored up at Etruria where the food was
to be off-loaded before being distributed around the Potteries.
However, at the last moment the barge's owners decided to send the
boat on to Manchester. Within a short time of this decision shop
owners in Hanley and Shelton heard the news and they in turn informed
their angry customers. They had probably heard about the barge's
departure from some of Wedgwood's own workers, certainly that
suspicion was voiced in a letter written by Josiah Wedgwood junior,
son of the famous potter. Later that same day Josiah junior wrote to
his father - who was then in London on business - describing how when
the news spread about the departing barge, several hundred men women
and children had quickly gathered and chased after it along the
canal, finally catching up with it at Longport. Believing that the
boat had been sent away to increase the scarcity of provisions and
thus up the prices even more, the crowd were in a black mood and not
to be trifled with, so when they found that the bargee would not pull
the boat over one of the crowd leapt aboard to tackle him. The
boatman immediately cut the tow rope and slashed at the man with his
knife and voices from the crowd on the towpath called out “Put him
in the canal.” A ducking may well have been the man's fate had not
another bargee come to his rescue and he had been able to escape onto
another craft, albeit leaving his own barge in the hands of the mob
as he did so.
The
captured boat was then hauled it back to Etruria in triumph and by
late afternoon was tied up alongside Wedgwood's Etruria works where
the crowd unloaded the cargo into the factory's crate shop. Most of
the rioters then went home meaning to return the next day for
distribution of the goods. In the meantime a few men were set as
guards. At about 7.30 that evening four of these sauntered up to
Etruria Hall and asked for something to eat and drink while they were
on watch. Another of the Wedgwood children, Josiah's older brother,
17 year old John went to them and stood talking with them for a time
then too did their mother Sarah Wedgwood who also spoke with them for
a while before the men went off. The nervousness of the Wedgwood
household at this point is, evident in young Josiah's hasty missive
to his father, but the family were not bothered any further that
evening and at breakfast the next day things were still quiet.
A
considered account of what happened next is difficult to come by,
certainly none seem to have been carried by newspapers of the time.
However, two anonymous letters were circulated by the press which –
though they vary in details – give a rough idea of how events
unfolded thereafter.
On the
Saturday morning the crowd gathered back at the canal side and some
of the goods seized the day before were sold off at what were
considered by the crowd to be more reasonable prices. One of the
letters states that this was at two-thirds the normal price, while
sometimes the goods were given away. The meagre proceeds were then
handed over to the disgruntled owners of the captive barge. The
authorities meanwhile had taken steps to deal with the rioters. An
express message had been sent to Lichfield asking for some companies
of the Staffordshire Militia to come to their aid. Closer at hand,
though, were a company of the Carmarthen Militia who that day had
arrived in Newcastle on their way back to Wales. Due to the troubles
in Newcastle itself and now in Etruria, the commanding officer was
asked if he could help in dealing with the rioters. He agreed, and
the force put itself at the disposal of the local magistrates who now
had the job of quelling the disturbances.
Some
justices went to meet with the mob still gathered around the captured
boat, but the Militia were kept at a distance while the officials
tried to settle matters peacefully. Here the letters are at odds with
one another, one stating that all efforts to get the mob to disperse,
including getting the master potters (whose workers formed the bulk
of the mob) to try and influence them, but to no avail, while the
other letter states that the magistrates' efforts were a success and
that the mob agreed to leave, providing the boat was left where it
was. Judging by the fact that several days later the mob was
demanding the return of the boat the latter seems the most likely
state of affairs, but the details still remain confused.
Nothing
of great significance seems to have happened on the Sunday, though
some of the local manufacturers and officials held a crisis meeting
at Newcastle to discuss how best to calm the situation down and deal
with the mob. A subscription was entered into perhaps to placate the
rioters, Josiah Wedgwood's son John was present at the meeting and
donated £10 to the fund. But after the quiet Sunday, Monday saw a
return to the stand-off of previous days as the mob gathered at
Etruria once more. This time they were in a far more bullish mood and
sent messengers to the magistrates outlining their demands, namely to
have the boat delivered back to them and its contents sold there.
After a
quiet Sunday, Monday saw a return to the stand-off as the mob
gathered once more, this time outside Billington's (probably the
premises of Richard Billington, who carted coals for Wedgwood and
rented 38 acres of the Etruria estate), where there was a meeting of
the master potters and several officials. These included John
Wedgwood in his father's stead, Dr Falkener of Lichfield, Mr Ing and
Mr John Sneyd of Belmont (a neighbour of the Wedgwoods), who
harangued the mob on their bad behaviour and the detrimental effect
it would have on the price of corn, as too did John Wedgwood and
Major Walter Sneyd of the Staffordshire Militia. The latter was there
at the head of a detachment of the Staffordshire Militia, who stood
by ready if needed. The masters and officials though still hoped that
the rioters would listen to reason and a generous subscription was
again raised, John Wedgwood giving £20 this time. The mob, though,
did not accept this graciously remarking caustically that the money
would not have been provided had they not caused trouble and made the
manufacturers sit up and pay attention. They continued calling for
the boat to be returned to them and the corn to be sold on fairly.
Their demands became so loud and threatening that the Riot Act was
read out and the mob was told that if they did not disperse to their
homes in an hour's time, that the Militia would be ordered to fire on
them. The crowd, though, were defiant, jeering that the militia men
dared not fire on them and that if they did then the rioters would
attack and destroy Keele Hall, the ancestral home of the Sneyd family
of Major Sneyd was the current heir. According to some accounts the
rioters also put their women and children at the front confident that
the soldiers could not fire on them.
Despite
this, after the hour had passed, the chief magistrate Dr Falkener was
apparently on the verge of ordering the nervous militiamen to fire,
when two of the rioters accidently fell down and made him pause and
consider his actions. One of the Sneyds, huzzaring as he did so, got
about 30 of the men to follow him, intending perhaps to charge the
mob, but his effort was thwarted by women in the crowd who called
out, “Nay, nay, that wunna do, that wunna do.” and embarrassed by
the mocking cries the militiamen baulked, turned back and left the
crowd alone. Unable or unwilling to take firm action, the officials
agreed that the corn taken in the boat should be sold on at a fair
price. And for now that was that and the crowd had their way. The
magistrates, though, were now determined to make the leaders of the
riot pay for the trouble they had caused and to bring the
disturbances to an end once and for all.
Two of
the ringleaders of the mob had been quickly identified as Stephen
Barlow and Joseph Boulton. According to report, Barlow was born in
Hanley Green, was aged about 38 and seems to have had a chequered
history prior to the riots, having apparently served in the
Staffordshire Militia, but had been drummed out for bad behaviour. He
may also have had previous with the law as records show that four
years earlier at the Epiphany Assizes at Stafford of 1779, one
Stephen Barlow was in court for some unspecified crime he had
committed in Penkridge. At some point he had married and by 1783 was
the father of four small children and was living in Etruria. The
authorities certainly knew where to look for him and that night after
the riot, magistrates and constables converged on his house. On
hearing the men at the door, Barlow quit his bed naked and attempted
to escape by climbing up the chimney. He probably would have got away
except that in his haste he dislodged some bricks and when his
pursuers came out to see what was happening they caught sight of him
hiding on the roof behind the chimney stack. When he was brought
down, Barlow refused to get dressed and though it was a cold night
suffered himself to be transported stark naked all the way from
Etruria to Newcastle. After subsequently being taken to Stafford
Gaol, Stephen Barlow was held there until his trial.
So too
was Joseph Boulton, but he remains a shadowy figure in this drama as
nothing seems to be known of his background. Beyond noting that two
ringleaders had been captured at home that night and sent to Stafford
gaol, his name was not mentioned in contemporary newspapers, though
John Wedgwood who was at Stafford to witness the trial wrote to his
father in London and noted that the man had been acquitted by the
court. Stephen Barlow, on the other hand was not so lucky. The judge
in summing up at the trial on 15th March, detailed
Barlow's offence and laid out the law regarding riots in the clear
and clinical manner of the Riot Act. “That all persons to the
number of twelve or more, who remain in any place in a tumultuous
manner after proclamation has been made for the space of one hour,
subject themselves to an indictment for capital felony. “ In other
words, the death sentence.
The
message this sent out was clear, namely those hundreds who had
assembled and been involved in the rioting on 10th March,
most of whom had since either fled the area or had thus far escaped
detection, were just as guilty as Barlow and could expect the same
treatment if caught and convicted. Barlow meanwhile was sentenced to
death without a quibble and on Monday 17th March 1783,
exactly a week after the riot, at Sandyford near Stafford, he was
escorted to the gallows by a body of militia and there he was hung by
the neck until he was dead. His body was then returned to the
Potteries and buried locally two days later.
It had
been a startlingly quick chain of events which did indeed have the
desired effect quelling any further disturbances, but it perhaps
shocked many law-abiding citizens too, disturbed by such arbitrary
use of the law. Looking back from over half a century later even
local historian John Ward - who as a solicitor had very little
sympathy with rioters – seems to have been taken aback by this
blatant show trial. Writing about Stephen Barlow, he noted that he
'became a victim rather to the public safety, than to the heinousness
of his crime.' According to some accounts Barlow was not the only
victim, as more than one paper reported briefly that following the
execution, Barlow's wife hung herself in despair.
Josiah
Wedgwood though was not so understanding. The danger the riot had
presented to his family, estate and pot bank had shaken him and being
a noted disciplinarian where his own workforce was concerned, the
likelihood that many of them had been involved in the troubles
doubtless rankled. On returning to the Potteries and hearing in
detail what had gone on, Wedgwood felt compelled to put pen to paper
and produced a short tract entitled An Address to the Young
Inhabitants of the Pottery in which he hoped to quell any future
disturbances by attempting to explain the wrong-headedness of the
rioters and to examine and dismiss their supposed grievances. Though
couched as a well-meaning sermon to soothe young minds, the piece
arguably comes across as being rather sanctimonious given the recent
circumstances; the musings of a rich man offering up self-serving
arguments to poor people who simply wanted food.
Reference:
John Ward, The Borough of Stoke-Upon-Trent, pp. 445-446; Ann
Finer and George Savage (Eds.), The Selected Letters of Josiah
Wedgwood p.268: Correspondence of Josiah Wedgwood, Vol. 3,
pp. 8-9; Derby Mercury, Thursday 13 March 1783, p.3;
Cumberland Pacquet and Ware's Whitehaven Advertiser, Tuesday
25 March 1783, p.3; Manchester Mercury, Tuesday 25 March 1783,
p.1; Kentish Gazette, Saturday 29 March 1783, p.3; Northampton
Mercury, Monday 24 March 1783, p.3; Stamford Mercury,
Thursday 27 March 1783, p.2; Ipswich Journal, Saturday 22
March 1783, p.1; Hereford Journal, Thursday 3 April 1783, p.3.